26 May 2010 @ 10:01 AM 

I remain unconvinced of the longevity or the validity given the softer images it provides and the variable quality of the ones I have seen to date…

Shrek Forever After, the fourth installment in the saga of the green CGI ogre, failed to meet even the “cautious expectations” of its producers at the weekend box office. Although the 3D film earned $71.3 million this weekend, its predecessor, Shrek 3, scored a much more imposing $122 million opening — without the benefit of inflated 3D ticket prices. Could Shrek Forever After’s under-performance indicate that movie-goers are over Hollywood’s transformative new technology?

Would you like to know more?

Posted By: Seahorse
Last Edit: 26 May 2010 @ 10:01 AM

EmailPermalink
Tags
Tags: ,
Categories: Movies


 

Responses to this post » (None)

 
Post a Comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

 


 Last 50 Posts
Change Theme...
  • Users » 4
  • Posts/Pages » 762
  • Comments » 45
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid « Default
  • LifeLife
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LightLight

About



    No Child Pages.